Home
entries friends calendar user info Previous Previous
capnsurly

Advertisement

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
OK, so what's the primary avenue for political dissent these day? Could it be...mmmmmmm...THE INTERNET!!!!? Isn't Germany in the EU...you know, the cradle of Nazism?

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/QWmPUCCvSXU/EU-Paves-the-Way-For-Three-Strikes-Cut-Off-Policy


Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
So, if I have a potential client in my car, do I have to turn off the radio? Can I sing? Can I quote an in-print book?

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/_MPzDIRF7uE/Singer-In-Grocery-Store-Ordered-To-Pay-Royalties

Seriously...what gave PRS the idea that they could do this in the first place? Shouldn't there be legal repercussions?

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
...that his business depends on the insecurity of the Internet?

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/NucUT_4lI34/Kaspersky-CEO-Wants-End-To-Online-Anonymity

Not to mention that it's a dumb idea.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/O9TMw4YmByA/Open-Source-Could-Have-Saved-Ontario-Hundreds-of-Millions

I'm OK with people making money for producing a piece of software. But when there's already a piece of software that someone has decided to release for free under an open source license, why not adopt it, especially when you're talking about the BILLION DOLLAR scale? If you take 1% of that, $10M, you could fund development and support of the application for years and years. Is it "security concerns"? Is it corruption? Is it fear of the unknown (aka "ignorance")? Think of the public good they could be doing by saving themselves $990M and further developing/patching the app for use by others.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/OkhdMyP91zQ/Judge-Thinks-Linking-To-Copyrighted-Material-Should-Be-Illegal

Seriously? OK, let's throttle the flow of information so it's easier to monitor and manipulate.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
...but I had a large amount of respect for their intellect. Guess I'm wrong again.

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/d6z3YhL-IQE/India-To-Put-All-Citizen-Info-In-a-Central-Database

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
I thought it was to protect children.

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/bRgW_SQQXTE/Tennesee-Man-Charged-In-Virtual-Pornography-Case

This guy didn't do anything to a kid. If I take a picture of the top half of a can of Coke and attach it to a picture of the bottom half of a can of Pepsi, am I guilty of trademark infringement?

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
...so I'm not going to bother pretending to be witty or insightful.

http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/05/28/2313230/Homeland-Security-To-Scan-Citizens-Exiting-US?from=rss

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Original post: http://capnsurly.livejournal.com/33054.html

Looks like his story was right on the money. But this is OK, right? You should do whatever the police say, because they know best. They certainly know better than the constitution.

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=40401

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=39712

I think the number of times he was tazed may be a little exaggerated, but otherwise, it sounds credible. Yes, he's obviously an uber-Bible-thumper, and I don't want the implication that I support his views, but it's his right. It's also supposed to be his right not to be searched without cause and not to be assaulted by law enforcement for no reason.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Makes you happy that Americans died to make sure the Brits could keep speaking English, huh?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/07/video-g20-police-assault

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
This LJ focuses on the loss of rights and freedoms, which normally means in the form of the actions of government. However, there's another predator out there: corporate caving. We've seen a tiny bit of it from the likes of Google (DMCA takedowns and content-based removals on YouTube, but considering their overall attempts at even-handed philanthropy, I cut them a little slack), but this from Amazon is over the top:

http://www.fictioncircus.com/news.php?id=346&mode=one

I wish I had bought something from Amazon recently, so I could return it.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/q1dhH2ArZB4/article.pl

The UK government is spending muchos poundos to publicize less-crazy Muslims so that the more-crazy Muslims don't seem as numerous (and therefore as crazy?)? Effectively, what they're doing is helping the real crazies to operate on the DL and make the public less suspicious of them. Awesome!

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
This bill CANNOT be allowed to pass. The first real (non-header) text is, "America’s failure to protect cyberspace..." That should tell you just about everything you need, but if not, read the whole thing yourself:

http://cdt.org/security/CYBERSEC4.pdf

The next section talks about how we need to protect private interests from corporate espionage.

The next section says "...our information infrastructure, including the Internet..."

Further down, it abuses a Booz Allen Hamilton study which recommended to ‘‘establish a single voice for cybersecurity within government’’. I don't think they understand what "within government" means.

"...implement a system to provide dynamic, comprehensive, real-time cybersecurity status and vulnerability information of all Federal government information systems and networks..." What's that I hear? Another "scare the masses into submission" terrorism color wheel?

The Centers shall "make loans, on a selective, short-term basis, of items of advanced cybersecurity countermeasures to small businesses with less than 100 employees." Huh? Vague much?

If you're not federall-certified, you can't do security work:
MANDATORY LICENSING.—Beginning 3 years
2 after the date of enactment of this Act, it shall be unlawful
3 for any individual to engage in business in the United
4 States, or to be employed in the United States, as a pro-
5 vider of cybersecurity services to any Federal agency or
6 an information system or network designated by the Presi-
7 dent, or the President’s designee, as a critical infrastruc-
8 ture information system or network, who is not licensed
9 and certified under the program.

First, this is stupid because it limits the pool of talent. Second, it's fucking fascism-exemplified.

SEC. 9. SECURE DOMAIN NAME ADDRESSING SYSTEM. --> They don't say WTF that means.

I skipped a whole bunch of wasted paper with lots of dollar signs to get down to this:
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The President...
5 (2) may declare a cybersecurity emergency and
6 order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic
7 to and from any compromised Federal government
8 or United States critical infrastructure information
9 system or network;
1 (6) may order the disconnection of any Federal
2 government or United States critical infrastructure
3 information systems or networks in the interest of
4 national security;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I've said it before, so why not say it again: If it's too sensitive to be on the Internet, take it off the goddam Internet!

You are, of course, encouraged to voice your opinion to your "representatives":
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
[scrapes jaw off floor] The UK's next, right? Oh, that's right, the UK already did it. http://dvice.com/archives/2006/10/uk_govt_has_neighbors_spy_on_e.php

http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/qsKL-Z-E5bw/article.pl

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend

Scenario: For exactly 1 minute, you get access to all the databases of all the intelligence agencies in the world (CIA, FBI, KGB, MI-5, etc). What do you want to find out before time is up and you're caught and jailed forever?


View 503 Answers

How fast can I destroy all these databases?

Thanks,
Chaz

Tags: , ,

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Anyone think it's open source?  LMFAO!!!

http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1238443907751.shtm

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
...you need a warrant, just like you do for searching, wiretapping (LOL, did I say you need a warrant for wiretapping!?), etc.

http://blog.aclu.org/2009/03/23/everywhere-you-want-to-be-and-everywhere-you-once-were/

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
...but as a health care provider receiving public funds, you are legally, morally, voluntarily required to dispense information regarding the patient's legal health care options!  You don't have to dispense the morning after pill to rape victims, but you have to tell them that there is such a thing.

http://blog.aclu.org/2008/08/26/proposed-bush-regulation-jeopardizes-womens-health/

The window for public commentary ends April 9.  use this link:  https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr008=ir43pzesi2.app25a&pagename=homepage&id=1354&page=UserAction

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
http://newsblaze.com/story/20090327170413zzzz.nb/topstory.html

According to http://www.un.org/Overview/uninbrief/, "the UN and its family of organizations work to promote respect for human rights", but it's OK to say that people shouldn't be able to criticize "religions", even if (especially if?) that religion espouses "death to infidels".  http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/2396

Islam, that condones sex with pre-pubescents (and I'm being very kind there):  http://www.islam-watch.org/Larry/Muhammad-in-Islamic-writings-sex-life-sexual-abuse-pedophilia.htm

Watch/listen to this; it's some crazy shit:  http://www.truthtube.tv/play.php?vid=753

So when does the UN pass a resolution that member countries should execute non-muslims because believing in another God is an "incitement to religious hatred in general and against Islam in particular" or causes "social disharmony"?

Lou Dobbs gets righter and righter.

Thanks,
Chaz

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
OK, I'll comment just a little bit.  Make sure to read down to where they talk about the company that provided the machines.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/64711.html

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Here's the link to the whole thing. http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1237930080517.shtm

Let me just call out some parts (verbatim) that produce a theme:
  • we are doubling the number of law enforcement personnel that are working in border-enforcement teams
  • We are also strengthening Operation Armas Cruzadas.
  • We are tripling the number of Department of Homeland Security Intelligence Analysts located on the Southwest border.
  • We are increasing the ICE -- that's Immigration and Custom Enforcement -- Attaché personnel in Mexico by 50 percent. These will primarily be located in Mexico City, working alongside the Attorney General of Mexico.
  • We will be increasing our efforts on what's called Operation Firewall
  • We are doubling the number of agents in our violent crime alien sections along the border.
  • We're quadrupling the number of border liaison officers.
  • We are bolstering technology and resources with a significant increase in our biometric identification deployment.
  • We are moving today 100 more CBP personnel to the border to do outbound inspections.
  • We are moving 12 teams of cross-trained dogs.
  • We are moving three mobile response teams of Border Patrol agents to deploy to the border.
  • And we're increasing the number of license plate readers on
  • Our goal is twofold. One is to provide assistance to the government of Mexico, to break up these huge cartels which . . . are conducting this war of violence within Mexico that has resulted in over 6,000 homicides, over 550 of which were assassinations of law enforcement and public official personnel.
Does this doubling/tripling/quadrupling shit not bother the rest of the country?  Although I'm linking this article for some of the DHS statistics it includes (number of employees: 150,000!!), the utter management FAIL can't be ignored.  http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=39821&ref=rellink

Oh, and, it's the [shiver] Department of HOMELAND Security.  GET THE FUCK OUT OF MEXICO!

We don't have to worry about Spanish being recognized as a national language, because we'll all be speaking German soon.

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
The US government exists only because it's citizens desire it to exist. It has no power that the people haven't asked it to have. At least, that's how it's supposed to be. When it doesn't fit that model anymore, when the government becomes a force of it's own, with it's own agenda and desires that do not embody the will of the people...THAT is when you need the Second Amendment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Olofson
http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=38969

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
And vendors who don't play get fried.

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/html/HB00481I.htm

Thanks,
Chaz
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
profile
User: [info]capnsurly
Name: capnsurly
calendar
Back December 2009
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
page summary
tags

Advertisement

Customize